Is Older Scotch Always Better Scotch?

macallan-anniversary-malt-25When you walk into your local liquor store in search of your favorite spirit, what do you notice at the top of the shelves? Usually it’s the pricier stuff at the top and the pricier stuff is often the “oldest” stuff. An 18 year old scotch is always more expensive than its 15 or 12 year old brother. A 30 year old is often even pricier. The older the age statement, the more expensive the scotch.

The real question, however, is – is older is always better?

My gut feeling, and it’s definitely a gut feeling, is that older can be better but that’s not always the case. My favorite story about aging whisky was when my wife and I went to The Macallan distillery. We took the tour and then opted for the Most Precious version, which involved enjoying several drams of nearly their entire line of scotch. My wife isn’t a fan of whisky so she took a tiny sip of each and made her usual face. She enjoys the smell, she just finds the taste overpowering. That is… until she tried the 30 Year Fine Oak. At a retail price of around $900, I’m not surprised she was a fan.

The oldest scotch I’d ever had is that 30 Year Fine Oak during the distillery tour (I’ve had it a couple times since on special occasions) but I routinely have 12, 15, and 18 year old scotches from the same distillery. I’ve always found that the 18 year old is usually smoother and has less bite to it as compared to the younger versions. In some cases, I like that bite (for example, I prefer the Glenlivet 12 because the heat from the alcohol and the spiciness on the finish complement each other), but in others I don’t. It’s a matter of preference.

Next, is there such a thing as too old? Kara Newman of Slate tried some 50 year old Glenfiddich and was wondering that very thing. She asked a few knowledgeable folks and the answer is that yes, it can be too old. Ultimately, it comes down to preference. The longer it’s in the barrel, the more the barrel imparts on the spirit. Can it do too much? Of course. I enjoyed that she asked several experts in different spirits, not just whiskies, but I wasn’t surprised by the answer.

Older isn’t always better but it often is. Now is it worth it to buy the older bottle? That’s up to you. You can buy over four bottles of Macallan 18 for just one bottle of Macallan 30 – which do you think is a better deal? 🙂

(Photo Credit: Pops.)

3 thoughts on “Is Older Scotch Always Better Scotch?

  1. Jim, great post!

    For me, older means different, not necessarily better. For me, the cut off is at 18yrs. Most whiskies hit their zenith somewhere between 14 and 18 yrs. After 18yrs, it is just a different flavor profile.

    Examples? Consider Glenfiddich 15yrs. Better than Glenfiddich 21. Another would be Highland Park 18yrs. Better in my opinion than HP 25 or 30, which while enjoyable are very concentrated and sometimes a tad woody.

    Cheers!

  2. I recently found a bottle of Chivas regal that was standard 12-year-old Scotch whiskey, but it was in my dad‘s closet and is probably closer to 40 or 50 years old. It is still un-opened and I am wondering if one it is still good and two if it’s worth anything?

  3. How funny you would say a bottle of 30yo is 4 bottles of 18 year old…. 2013, the good times. Sadly it is no longer the case in 2018. Over the past 3 years, older Macallan has become extremely rare and a bottle of 30yo Macallan is now 3-4000GBP while a bottle of 18 year old is about 2-300GBP. So, far from 4 bottles eh?
    In 2015 I bought a 1976 and 1982 vintage of the Macallan 18 year old for 1200GBP and 850GBP respectively in London (Hedonism shop in Mayfair near Bond Street station). I checked the price last week – November 2018 – and they are now over 4000GBP and 3000GBP respectively. Crazy!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.